Scope
This policy applies to factual statements, calculations, citations, labels, charts, policy information, links, accessibility descriptions, and other published material controlled by MindBridge. It does not require the publication to change a good-faith opinion, scenario, risk judgment, or analytical conclusion solely because a reader disagrees.
Market information can change after publication. A later price move or new event does not automatically mean the earlier description was incorrect when published. The review considers the information, timing, source, and context available at the relevant point.
How to submit a report
Email with the subject line Correction Request. Include the page URL, the exact statement or element, the reason it may be wrong or misleading, and the strongest available supporting source. Include the date and time of access when the issue concerns market data or an external link.
Do not send sensitive account information. A correction report does not require a brokerage statement, password, account number, or identity document.
Review process
- Confirm that the report identifies a specific statement, data point, link, or presentation issue.
- Review the cited source and compare it with available primary or authoritative information.
- Determine whether the issue is factual, analytical, technical, editorial, accessibility-related, or caused by a third-party data feed.
- Assess materiality, reader impact, and whether an immediate correction, clarification, source update, or no change is appropriate.
- Document the result in a manner proportionate to the issue.
Correction classifications
Material correction
A material correction addresses an error or omission that could substantially change the meaning, risk interpretation, identity, or conclusion a reasonable reader takes from the content.
Substantive clarification
A clarification improves accuracy or context when the original wording could reasonably be misunderstood, even if the underlying statement was not plainly false.
Minor correction
A minor correction addresses spelling, grammar, formatting, a broken link, a mislabeled element, or a non-material numerical or citation issue.
Third-party data issue
A provider error, delay, revision, outage, symbol mapping issue, or licensing change may require a notice, provider escalation, removal, or source replacement rather than a rewrite of MindBridge analysis.
How corrections are presented
The form of a correction depends on significance. A material issue may require revising the text, changing a chart or label, adding a correction note, updating related pages, or temporarily removing content. A minor issue may be corrected directly without a prominent notice when the change does not alter meaning.
Policies do not display public update dates under the current policy framework. This does not prevent internal documentation of a change or a clear correction note where the reader needs that context.
Opinions, forecasts, and disagreements
Analysis often involves uncertainty, weighting, assumptions, and scenarios. A reasoned difference of opinion is not a factual error. MindBridge may revise an opinion when evidence changes, but the existence of a different market view does not by itself require a correction.
Reports are more useful when they identify a verifiable fact, omitted source, calculation issue, conflict between text and data, or statement that does not match the cited evidence.
Related-content review and records
When an error affects a repeated fact, data mapping, methodology statement, chart label, or policy disclosure, the review should identify other pages that may contain the same issue. A correction is incomplete when the visible example is changed but the same error remains elsewhere.
Correction records may include the report, source material, assessment, classification, change made, related pages reviewed, and reason for any denial or limitation. Records support consistency and do not imply that every editorial disagreement requires a public correction notice.
Timing and limitations
Reports are reviewed according to materiality, complexity, market relevance, available evidence, and operational capacity. No fixed response or completion time is promised. Some issues require confirmation from a provider or source that MindBridge does not control.
A response may not be provided to repetitive, abusive, fraudulent, vague, or unsupported submissions. This policy does not create a guarantee that all errors will be identified or that every reader will agree with the outcome.